With the one day G20 London Summit over, 40 days later the world is still teetering over the brink of an economic collapse. What exactly was accomplished apart from a 7 page communiqué of intentions that cost Britain up to £50 Million for security and staging the event, isn't clear yet.



Overall we got 20 world leaders together to set a new course for the global economy, but it looks like much the same thing we had before the economic meltdown. Don't forget these same people also charted the meltdown through ignoring the consequences of unfettered capitalism and globalization they and their governments were pursuing. And they didn't see it coming. Basically if global capitalism is dying of a lack of capital and frozen credit, the G20 will infuse it with more capital or more money and credit, a Trillion Dollars worth.

It makes sense. What else are you going to do? World Government? More socialism? A global attack on poverty?

If the G20 cure works, it still might cause complications about as severe as the disease, when capitalism bloats up with a staggering new inflation. No one at the G20 except the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, whose country went through one of the worst inflations ever before the Weimar Republic fell to the Nazis, seems to be worried. I suppose we'll get to that collapse later if it happens.


Seems also no one except Merkel is interested either in how the meltdown happened. She figures we need to know before we can act. But these are desperate times, so the G20 is acting in a hurry, more or less stoking the engines of commerce even if they might be broken. Hope they're right.

BBC News April 2, 2009 But in an even more radical step, the G20 leaders appear to have agreed to increase another type of IMF funds, the quotas owned by individual countries, by an additional $250bn. This would be done by creating more of its own currency, the SDR or special drawing right . . .

Although the G20 are still gambling that capitalism will work again, they have agreed to regulate global markets and financial institutions more than they have, indeed going further and turning the International Monetary Fund into a bigger force for stability giving it the authority to print its own international money or Special Drawing Rights. Perhaps the G20 will turn the IMF into

the most powerful watchdog and regulator of the global economy.

If anybody is the clear winner at the G20 London Summit it is the new IMF. The G20 have awarded it more money and power, largely outsourcing their own problems and what they want done about them to the IMF. It makes sense. It might work. Somebody's got to fix the meltdown and insure it doesn't happen again. But the IMF's record on the meltdown isn't exactly prescient: The watchdog that failed to bark in the night.

WASHINGTON April 6, 2009 (Reuters) - The IMF gave itself a scathing review for its mistakes in spotting the roots of the global crisis and acknowledged it fell short in its job as the world's global financial overseer.

In a series of papers that look at the initial lessons from the crisis, the IMF said a patchwork of uncoordinated oversight and ineffective messaging failed to spot and call attention to the risk that a global credit boom could burst spectacularly, triggering the worst global slump in decades. . . .

Desperate times: Reward an organization that failed to do its job? Now you guys can print your own money. Now you guys fix the economy. That was easy. That should help. Why didn't AIG think of this?

But while we're rehashing what happened in London, we should look back at why tens of thousands of protesters descended and what made the news then. You'd have to call it a lack of confidence in governments and institutions, especially in capitalism itself. Why bailout capitalism and globalization in the first place? Why do 20 guys hide behind a security wall millions of pounds thick? What are the leaders of the free world afraid of?

I doubt if the G20 bothered to ask. For somewhere between £19 to £50 Million you would expect something more than a photo op. In the news April 1st there was more interest in the conficker worm than why all the protests in London. Why the big coalition of
activists, Put People First, and that other coalition of police and military that locked down The City?

Besides some windows smashed and some protesters roughed up, the big flap was about the Queen's new iPod, what do you give a queen anyway? And Michelle Obama hugging the Queen. Thanks to video it was clear the Queen started the hug herself, what a relief.

The protesters outside? A few soundbites and more pictures of the crowds on TV. With all the hundreds of reporters present, nearly all of them safely locked up with the G20 at the Excel Centre, why bother going out to find out?

The only thing I saw that really explained why it was all happening, was a CTV News Net interview with Carrie Reichardt. No video but she was in the crush of police and protesters on her cell phone talking live. Not a flake or an anarchist, not a streetperson or a publicity junkie, a visual artist from England who knew why she was there and why we were fascinated by what we saw.

Carrie Reichardt reminded us of history. When people en mass take to the streets they do have legitimate grievances. Recall Civil Rights Marches in the U.S.? Recall earlier protests in London when the British Empire condoned slavery in their colonies? Mass protests are important and have changed government policies and when ignored have changed governments themselves. Protest was for justice. Without justice there's revolution.


What was even more gripping was her first-hand report of the rough and nasty tactics used by security forces to deal with peaceful demonstrators.

With the Excel Center at the end of Canary Wharf sealed off behind a giant police buffer zone, the rest of the security forces were deployed for crowd control. It was a military type operation, with the crowds broken up into smaller units boxed in by the police. Once in, you couldn't get out of your box. Every so often, she said, for no apparent reason, the police would charge the protesters and crush them together tighter which was bringing on a panic. Getting desperate, the protesters would fall to their knees crying to stop the police assault. Here's what Carrie said in London April 1st.

Some people were hurt and some others assaulted by police armed with nightsticks, some video and pictures on the Internet sparking a bigger row for an investigation into police brutality.

It's a sad comment on democracy when people with rights of free speech and assembly, rights some once fought and died for, are being harassed for demonstrating peacefully. Hope the economic meltdown doesn't lead us down the road to tyranny. Is the G20 listening?

If the G20 wants to earn our respect they should face the people, instead of meeting behind closed doors for secret deliberations. This kind of practical expedient to get the job done at a conference, a conference with no outside participation, isn't worth it. A press release, a few speeches over dinner, that's all we get. Not even an apology, sorry we blew it, people of the world. What's the matter with talking freely before the public? What's wrong with more dialog?

PR And The Press

London Summit 2009 Official Website

G-20MeltdownOrg Official Website

WSJ Decoding the G20 Communique

Telegraph UK Splash Page

BBC News G20 Highlights

Telegraph UK G20 Summit Timeline

Reuters IMF Admits Faults



Telegraph UK Police Brutality

AP Protesters/Police Clash Bank of England

Guardian UK G20 Plot Foiled

Telegraph UK G20 Costs £50 Million






AP 40,00 Police At Summit

AP Thousands March In Europe

Telegraph UK Bankers Ditch Suits

NYT Obama Will Face A Defiant World






Newsday Obama: Summit Turning Point

Telegraph UK Playboy Playmate vs G20

Telegraph UK 15,000 Protest Early

Guardian UK No, it was 35,000





Telegraph UK Put People First Coalition

G20 News Video

ABC News Bloody Protests Storm London

Telegraph UK G20 Protesters Complain






Guardian UK Brown Announces $1 Trillion

Guardian UK Police Assault Leads To Death

Guardian UK Baton Charges

Official UK Gov Videos

Inside The Leaders' Lounge

Press Conference: Obama pt1

Press Conference: Obama pt4





All 33 Press Conference Videos

G20 Slideshows

Official Photostream on Flickr

Guardian UK G20 Protest






CTV Newsnet:
Carrie Reichardt,
G20 activist

An activist protesting the summit in London says most protesters are being peaceful but have been surrounded by riot police on the street. She says a few times they were charged by the officers, prompting many to drop to their knees and throw their hands up.

Watch her London April 1, 2009 Interview

--Alan Gillis

One thing the French are very proud of is their universities. Not only are standards high, apart from yearly fees of about $300, higher education is free. It's also independent of commercial interests. Big business doesn't have any control over the curriculum like it has in many countries now through financing job training for business and commerce, and university research to suit itself and its goals: profits from new product development. In France you don't go to school to get a job. You get an education first.

The contrast couldn't be more extreme between the high costs other students pay or can't pay and so don't go, and the ready access to education in France. As fundamental, is the decline in education that France has largely avoided, with students more literate before they go to university, and more mature on the need to work once they get in. Anything threatening a solid French education is taken seriously. The new threat is government reform.

Universities are slipping everywhere with huge classes and an assembly line approach. Worse is the trend in many American and European institutions of transforming themselves into extremely expensive glorified Community Colleges, with Arts and Humanities especially relegated to the dustbin of we can't afford this and who needs this anyway. The proposed reforms aren't tackling these problems. French reform is about efficiency, accountability of lecturers-researchers and the value of their research or lack of it. It's also about giving universities more autonomy, a new direction toward a corporate merger with industry and commerce: a new source of financing. It's the current game plan in American Universities for better or worse. The reaction in France from academics and students has been an overwhelming no way!

General mobilizations of profs and students since February 5th against the new proposed law reforming universities, the LRU, have broken out from university campuses into the streets, paralyzing French higher education. From a public Princesse de Clèves read-in in Paris to make a point on the importance of a liberal education, to mass demonstrations against the LRU's barrage of reforms. President Sarkozy and Co are under attack. Some protesters have even accused the President not only of being out of touch with the French esprit but of using poor French to knock the University Establishment, so what does he know about education?

So little it seems that he's alienated 70-odd universities against his reforms, not just students but the lecturers-researchers who started the massive strikes throughout France since his colloquial jab in January at the cushy non-competitive university life enjoyed by unproductive profs and researchers who publish 30% to 50% less (in some disciplines) say than their British counterparts.

In the name of greater university autonomy and efficiency Sarkozy wants to give university presidents, presidential powers over academic staff and researchers and research itself. Staff performance will be reviewed every four years. Researchers who don't publish enough could be punished by having to teach more. Universities will be encouraged to find private financing for research and programs, pitting them against each other. Some 900 jobs cut. Already in place, one in two vacant positions due to retirement, not filled as the Sarkozy policy goes in the Civil Service.

Sarkozy's January get with it speech from the Elysée, in defense of the LRU reforms made public last October by his minister for higher education Valérie Pécresse, has sparked a May '68 reaction that has shutdown nearly all universities in France. Though many lecturers-researchers supporting the strikes are still drawing salaries while they strike, an element of farce not ignored by their non-striking colleagues, still most strikers claim they are trying to save the semester by carrying on with classes where they can, even in cafés. The strikes and marches go on in spite of French government backpedaling on the LRU. Entirely peaceful, good-humored protests that have simply closed down the universities without any use of force.

Only at the Sorbonne in Paris have tensions skyrocketed. The anti-reform movement took the offensive, finally clashing with the forces of order. Here's the direct link, if your reader doesn't support the window below, to a dramatic student video on the Sorbonne occupation from the Sorbonne's student newsmagazine, Contrepoint.

Blocage de la sorbonne 4 mars 2009
by contrepoint

Up until March 4th, the Sorbonne, France's oldest and largest university, managed to remain open until students and profs tried to occupy it twice. The next day they voted for a total strike and now the Sorbonne is under siege by security forces to keep militants out, hundreds of police and private security guards called in by the university administration. With classes disrupted anyway by anti-reform students and profs sneaking in, the lecture halls were finally locked.


Tensions throughout France were high the next day March 5th with planned demonstrations in many cities against La LRU - "mon cul!" and the Loi Pécresse - "mes fesses!" 24,000 to 43,000 marched in Paris countered by 9,000 police, and this just before Pécresse was to announce further concessions the next day.

Over three sessions of negotiations with 4 unions representing many of the 57,000 or so lecturers-researchers, Pécresse modified the LRU, meeting some objections, returning to the status quo on others, but hanging on to one important change:

a peer review of performance every 4 years.
Forcing researchers to teach more if their research performance wasn't good enough, was dropped. And evaluations would not come from the office of a university president as before, but from the CNU, the national university council.

Not good enough for the largest of the unions, Snesup-FSU, which hadn't even participated in the discussions with the government. Le Monde quoted a union representative as "noting" the new "inflections" but they were "far from being sufficient".
If the modified LRU goes ahead now this September it means no jobs cut through 2011.

The main bone of contention, performance evaluation goes ahead without any teeth, amounting to another academic exercise, embarrassing, time-consuming, stressful and perhaps unfair. How do you evaluate research and teaching and then measure it? And couldn't such a process become political?

Though some academics in France and Britain think a movement to accountability on

performance is a good idea. After all it's a well known fact that some researchers don't like teaching and some lecturers aren't good at teaching either. In the end it's the students who pay for these university indulgences. Though how do you fix abuses and poor performance without some penalties attached? How do you avoid alienating the majority of lecturers-researchers who do their best anyway, when you start poking into their careers, or fishing for personal problems they might have that affect their performance?


What it comes down to is an attack on university tenure. It's the same sort of protection awarded to judges in the courts of Europe. Once appointed they aren't accountable for their performance. It makes perfect sense to leave them to do their work, instead of having to defend it. The screening process should be enough to select the best people, and the laws of the land to keep them honest. The judges of the U.S. Supreme Court also have tenure and by and large tenure for university academics is longstanding practice and fundamental to academic freedom most everywhere.


It also means politics can't sink into university life, that profs aren't afraid of being fired for expressing opinions or being critical of anything in society. It's an essential right which shouldn't be compromised by governments and university administrations, even if there are some faults and abuses Sarkozy wants to fix.

In any case tenure is under attack in other ways since the 1960's when many profs supported the students over university policies and government failures. This is a hot issue which only simmers in the university community. If you haven't got tenure, complaining could get you fired.


Tenure used to be automatic after a number of years for an assistant professor. Now it's being withheld at some universities indefinitely on no other grounds except the additional costs of tenure, added salary and benefits and no other way of cutting staff during a downturn. This puts a considerable strain on the younger and financially strapped assistant profs still paying off enormous student loans who perhaps might feel obliged to earn their tenure in other ways, if they can't get it through their academic brilliance. It creates a corporate atmosphere of having to climb the ladder of success, where money, power and position become the objects of university life and politics the means.

The struggle between the French government and the universities goes on. There's no end in sight. A dozen academic and student unions and associations voted March 6th to continue the strikes.

When a million French took to the streets in January to voice their discontent with business and commerce and government inaction on the economic crisis, what could Sarkozy expect when he wanted to fix something French that wasn't broken?

French Sources:

Le Monde 7/03/2009, Compromis entre Valérie Pécresse et quatre syndicats sur le statut des enseignants-chercheurs

AFP 5/03/2009, Universités: des milliers de manifestants à Paris et en province

Contrepoint, coverage by students of the Sorbonne

Portail de veille sur le mouvement de l'Université, a message board on the LRU Protest

UniversitésEnLutte, a major association concerned with university issues and the LRU

Sauvonsl'Université, a major association concerned with university issues and the LRU

Elysée 01/22/2009, President Nicolas Sarkozy's speech on LRU reforms, video and transcript


English Sources: UniversityWorldNews

France: Academics strike over job status, 2/01/2009

France: Lecturers strike despite increased funding, 2/08/2009

France: Strikes spread despite mediator, 2/15/2009

France: End to academic strikes?, 3/01/2009

France: Lecturers vote to continue strike, 3/08/2009